Contingency Hiring vs. Retained Search

Asymmetric Talent_The Hiring Model Matters

The model you choose determines the outcome before the search even starts.

Contingency staffing operates on volume and speed. Multiple firms, split focus, no accountability until a hire is made. The search completion rate industry-wide sits around 25%. That means three out of four searches fail to close. The talent pool is limited to whoever is actively looking, the process is invisible, and validation is whatever the recruiter decides it is that day.

ATS runs a different model. 100% completion rate on committed searches. Talent pools of 500 to 800 profiles per engagement. Market penetration of 65 to 75%. Cold outreach engagement over 60%, against an industry benchmark of 15 to 25%. Shortlists delivered in 3 to 4 weeks versus the contingency average of 8 to 16.

And when 46% of new hires fail within 18 months, and a bad hire costs between 30 and 200% of annual salary, the model is not a minor detail. It’s the decision.

Download the one-pager to see the full comparison.

How can we serve you?

We look forward to exploring a valuable partnership.